Time for some love…

Truth is, I haven’t given my X100V much love lately. I’d had a few instances of camera shake spoiling photos (down to not using a fast enough shutter speed, given my shaky hands..) so ended up using my recently purchased Sony A7C with its image stabilisation and of course full-frame sensor for ‘casual’ photography. Not such a satisfying experience using it, as the ergonomics are no match for a Fujifilm camera. The tiny viewfinder is a pain if you wear glasses, and even with a slim 35 or 40mm prime lens it’s also still a fair bit bigger than an X100V.

So a misty morning this week seemed like a good opportunity to try and rekindle the connection. I figured that mono would suit the misty conditions, so set the camera up with a mono film simulation, tweaked to give me the high contrast look that Leica cameras are renowned for. Just took the camera, no filters etc and off I went.

The half an hour I planned to spend wandering locally ran to almost two hours, and I took around 35 shots.

Started processing them by loading the JPG simulated files into Lightroom, and have to say I wasnt that keen – they all looked a bit ‘muddy’ and the small amount of grain effect was rather noticeable. Fortunately I always shoot with RAW enabled, and these files, although lacking ‘bite’ were much cleaner. I had recently bought the DxO Pure RAW add-in, so as an experiment processed all the RAWs in that.

Wow! – what a difference, much brighter, sharper, and cleaner – noise, especially in the higher ISO shots was much better too. So these became my start point, and only a modicum of tweaking was needed, both to the shots I left as mono, and the few that seemed to work better in colour. I’m very happy with the results.

So it leaves me in a quandary – do I still need the A7C for ‘casual’ photography where a 35mm or so lens works for most shots, or is the smaller lighter X100V the way to go? (After all, I’ve also got a Sony A7iv and both zoom and prime lenses where I need flexibility, and that’s a much better option then than the A7C). What are your thoughts on the subject?

The Same But Better…

One of the criticisms of all the earlier series of X100 cameras has been the close up performance of the built-in 23mm lens, especially at wide apertures. The general view has been that it yields rather soft images unless well stopped down. I can’t say I have noticed it particularly, as I would generally strive to use at least f8 when close in to ensure a reasonable depth of focus. The latest X100 camera, the X100V, has, amongst a number of other changes and improvements been given a redesigned lens – still 23mm (35mm FF equivalent) and still f2, but the all new design is claimed to give sharper images at all distances.

At normal distances and apertures I’ve been more than happy with the results from the new camera, but a trip to Cannock Chase a week or so ago gave me the opportunity to try a close up image. This was hand held, and obviously quite close to the ground, and at f8 I reckon sharpness will do for me! Certainly nothing to complain about there…